SONIC/Journal & community
← All decision guides

COF JOURNAL / DECISION GUIDE

Copy trading history: recognise useful evidence

Distinguish simulation, partial history and documented execution. A method for reading a copy trading service’s evidence.

Define what is being observed

A curve can represent a backtest, demo account, live account or selected transactions. Establish that distinction before reading the result. Record the period, instruments, open positions and calculation method. A screenshot alone cannot reconstruct the series.

Look for gaps

Reconcile operations with a dated statement. Ask how cancellations, costs, corrections and discontinued accounts are treated. Results selected afterwards do not describe every scenario encountered. Useful evidence also identifies inactive periods and incidents without turning missing observations into invented zeroes.

Read COF evidence within its scope

The COF evidence page is a reference point, not a performance guarantee. Read each item’s source type, date and limitations. Unavailable evidence remains unverified. Documented past performance cannot predict the results of your own account.

Reconstruct a complete sequence

An isolated screenshot may show an outcome without the preceding decision, costs, missing events or period end. A more useful reading looks for a dated sequence and explicit scope: source or replicated account, simulation or live, full history or excerpt.

Keep interruptions visible. A history limited to favourable episodes cannot establish service coverage. Missing data does not become a loss-free operation, and a missing row does not prove there was no activity.

Classify evidence before interpreting it

Label the observation type, period and limitations. Readers should be able to find the source and understand what remains outside the file. A verifiable series is still historical; it is not a promise about future operations.

Your verification grid

ItemDocument or check to request
ScopeState live or simulated, source or copier, and the covered dates.
CompletenessRequest losing trades, incidents and inactive periods too.
Account eventsSeparate market trades, deposits, withdrawals and corrections.
ChargesIdentify what the history includes, excludes or leaves unknown.
TraceabilityLink a claim to a dated statement while protecting private data.

Practical questions

Is a curve screenshot enough to verify a history?

It shows an image at a point in time. Without scope, statements and method, it cannot reconstruct trades, external flows or charges. Evidence may be useful for one precise fact without establishing a complete history.

Does source history prove copying for every member?

No. Replication evidence requires reconciliation of the relevant account and its events in a private setting. The presence of a source or service does not prove every copy was executed.

To complete this file: Copy trading risks: a control checklist ; Trading journal: fields that make decisions reviewable.

Sources and limitations

ESMA — supervision des services de copy trading. Editorial consultation: 8 October 2026. Supplier statements do not replace independent checks. Re-read terms at the time of your decision.

COFIATRADING has commercial relationships with partners presented on the site. This guide is educational, without personalised investment advice. Trading involves capital loss risk; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Continue checking: current offers and access, public evidence, Desk space and Academy resources.

COFIATRADING / LE DESK

Choisissez votre prochain espace.

Vue d’ensemble du desk

Vos accès directs

Les espaces privés conservent leur connexion et leurs conditions d’accès.

Copy trading history: recognise useful evidence — Journal COF · COFIATRADING