Start with exclusions
The first comparison column should identify the legal entity and accepted residence. A service unavailable in your country leaves the comparison before interface or price considerations. Compare genuinely equivalent offers: the same product family, client status and contractual documents.
Build a usable grid
Use rows for costs, withdrawal methods, tools, support hours and complaints. Add a source and date to each cell. A blank cell identifies a question to ask, not a poor score. Keep supplier-published information separate from observations you have made yourself.
The decision remains yours
COF has commercial relationships with partners. Disclosure does not replace examination of your constraints. This guide offers a documentary method without naming one best broker for everyone. Deciding not to open an account should remain a normal outcome of comparison.
A comparison grid rather than a podium
A documentation grid can use one row per entity and columns for intended residence, verified authorisation, product, costs, withdrawals and remedies. Each field records its source and date. The result exposes comparable information and gaps in the file.
An offer outside the territory being studied does not become comparable because it has a popular platform. Missing cost information should not artificially improve its place. Separating scope first avoids rankings led merely by the most visible information.
Review the method itself
Explain which items were observed and which come from the provider. Without independently measured execution, the grid remains a document comparison. A commercial relationship should be disclosed without being treated as quality evidence.
Your verification grid
| Item | Document or check to request |
|---|---|
| Offer A and offer B | Record both legal entities, jurisdictions and the exact offers compared. |
| Availability | Compare offers only when residence terms are documented. |
| Cost | Use the same instrument, currency and holding-duration assumptions. |
| Withdrawals | Compare required documents, charges, stated times and complaints channels. |
| Evidence quality | Label provider statements, registers and independent observations separately. |
Practical questions
How should I compare an unknown field?
Leave it unknown and record the question sent to the provider. Treating it as zero or a good score would manufacture a ranking. An incomplete grid can still show precisely which documents are missing.
Why not name one best broker?
Residence, entity, products and terms can change the comparison. COF partners have a disclosed commercial relationship, rather than universal certification. This grid helps read offers; it does not choose an investment for you.
To complete this file: Xlence review: entity, restrictions and checks ; Libertex review: identify your account entity.
Sources and limitations
AMF — Vérifier une autorisation. Editorial consultation: 8 October 2026. Supplier statements do not replace independent checks. Re-read terms at the time of your decision.
COFIATRADING has commercial relationships with partners presented on the site. This guide is educational, without personalised investment advice. Trading involves capital loss risk; past performance does not guarantee future results.
Continue checking: current offers and access, public evidence, Desk space and Academy resources.